EVALUATION OF SPRING WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER WATER STRESSED CONDITION

Authors

  • Naveed Yaseen Sial University College of Dera Murad Jamali https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0741-3559
  • Mahboob Ali Sial
  • Ghulam Fareed
  • Amir Ali Mastoi
  • Ayaz Ali Keerio https://orcid.org/0000-00016113-625x
  • Muhammad Adeel Butt
  • Muhammad Aslam Mengal
  • Sana Ullah Baloch
  • Sajid Ali Shah
  • Bismillah Khan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34016/pjbt.2024.21.02.951

Keywords:

Screening, Wheat, Genotypes, Yield, Drought

Abstract

Pakistan faces severe challenges in wheat production annually due to the devastating effects of drought stress. Therefore, present research was carried out to evaluate 15 exotic bread wheat genotypes along with the local check variety, Khirman for their performance under drought stress. Analysis of variance revealed that all the traits were significantly different (P<0.01) among the cultivars. Based on mean performance, genotype V-18 showed better performance for all the studied characters, while genotype V-14 showed desirable performance for different traits such as early growth vigor, number of grains spikelet-1, number of grains spike-1, number of spikelets spike-1, spike length, peduncle length, and grain yield plant-1. The local check Khirman also produced desirable values for four different traits, namely early growth vigor, number of grains spike-1, peduncle length, and grain yield plant-1. The cluster analysis divided all the genotypes into three distinct clades. The first cluster comprises V-14, V-18, and the local check Khirman, which performed very well under drought conditions compared to the other genotypes. The presence of these genotypes with the local check Khirman is regarded as indicative of drought-tolerant genotypes. The second cluster comprises nine genotypes, namely V-10, V-11, V-12, V-13, V-16, V-19, V-20, and V-23, which performed moderately compared to the genotypes found in the drought-tolerant cluster. The last cluster comprises four genotypes, namely V-09, V-15, V-17, and V-22, which performed very poorly under drought conditions. Overall, the two exotic lines, V-14 and V-18, which were in the cluster with the drought-tolerant variety Khirman, performed very well and can be considered as drought-tolerant genotypes

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ahmad, A., Aslam, Z., Javed, T., Hussain, S., Raza, A., Shabbir, R., & Tauseef, M. (2022). Screening of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance through agronomic and physiological response. Agronomy, 12(2), 287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020287

Arain, S. M., Sial, M. A., & Jamali, K. D. (2022). Identification of wheat mutants with improved drought tolerance and grain yield potential using biplot analysis. Pak. J. Bot, 54(1), 45-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2022-1(29)

Chowdhury, M. K., Hasan, M. A., Bahadur, M. M., Islam, M. R., Hakim, M. A., Iqbal, M. A., & Islam, M. S. (2021). Evaluation of drought tolerance of some wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes through phenology, growth, and physiological indices. Agronomy, 11(9), 1792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091792

Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. biometrics, 11(1), 1-42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

Faheem, M., Sial, M. A., Arain, S., & Laghari, K. A. (2023). Comparison of yield performance of wheat genotypes over environments by GGE-biplot analysis. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 33(1). 85-94

Khadka, K., Earl, H. J., Raizada, M. N., & Navabi, A. (2020). A physio-morphological trait-based approach for breeding drought tolerant wheat. Frontiers in plant science, 11, 715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00715

Kovach, K. K. (2005). Musings on Idea (l) s in the Ethical Regulation of Mediators: Honesty, Enforcement, and Education. Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol., 21, 123.

Memon, H. M. U., Sial, M. A., & Bux, H. (2022). Evaluation of bread wheat genotypes for water stress tolerance using agronomic traits. Acta Agrobotanica, 75(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.751

Mustafa, D., & Usman Qazi, M. (2008). Karez versus tubewell irrigation: the comparative social acceptability and practicality of sustainable groundwater development in Balochistan, Pakistan. Contemporary South Asia, 16(2), 171-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09584930701733514

Pakistan Economic Survey, Government of Pakistan. 2024. Pp24.

Poudel, M. R., Ghimire, S., Pandey, M. P., Dhakal, K. H., Thapa, D. B., & Poudel, H. K. (2020). Evaluation of wheat genotypes under irrigated, heat stress and drought conditions. J. Biol. Today's World, 9(1), 212.

Rawtiya, A. K., & Kazaly, G. (2021). Drought stress and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield: A review. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 10(5), 1007-1012.

Regmi, D., Poudel, M. R., Bishwas, K. C., & Poudel, P. B. (2021). Yield stability of different elite wheat lines under drought and irrigated environments using AMMI and GGE biplots. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 9(2), 98-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v9i2.38018

Sial, N. Y., Faheem, M., Sial, M. A., Roonjho, A. R., Muhammad, F., Keerio, A. A., & Afzal, M. (2022). Exotic wheat genotypes response to water-stress conditions. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 54 (2) 297-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2022.54.2.7

Downloads

Published

2024-09-27

How to Cite

Sial, N. Y., Sial, M. A., Fareed, G., Mastoi, A. A., Keerio, A. A., Butt, M. A., … Khan, B. (2024). EVALUATION OF SPRING WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER WATER STRESSED CONDITION. Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology, 21(2), 489–493. https://doi.org/10.34016/pjbt.2024.21.02.951

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.