EVALUATION THE CAPACITY OF SUBDIVISION HYDERABAD RURAL FOR CULTIVATION OF CHICKPEA VARIETY DG-92 ON DIFFERENT FARMERS FIELDS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34016/pjbt.2023.20.02.769Keywords:
Chickpea, Seed, plant height, population, biological yieldAbstract
This research study was carried out ever first time on the field of 14 farmers of subdivision (tahseel) Hyderabad (rural), Sindh province of Pakistan during Rabi season, 2021-22 to evaluate the capacity of the targeted area as well as performance of chickpea variety DG-92 to find out a new chickpea belt in Sindh province of Pakistan. The field study was conducted in a three replicated randomized complete block design (RCBD) with net plot size of one acre per farmer, means 14 farmers-14 acres in total. Different fields of fourteen (14) farmers were taken as treatments, these were (T1 = Farmer 1, T2= Farmer 2, T3 = Farmer 3, T4 = Farmer 4, T5 = Farmer 5, T6 = Farmer 6, T7 = Farmer 7, T8= Farmer 8, T9 = Farmer 9, T10 = Farmer 10, T11 = Farmer 11, T12 = Farmer 12, T13 = Farmer 13 and T14= Farmer 14) were evaluated the performance of chickpea variety DG–92 for various agronomic traits. The results showed that highest plant population m-2 (32.95) was recorded from the field of farmer 4 and the lowest plant population m-2 (22.89) was recorded from the field of farmer 10. The maximum plant height (77.23 cm) was recorded from the field of farmer 1 and the minimum plant height (48.63 cm) was recorded from the field of farmer 8. The maximum branches plant-1 (21.70) were recorded from the field of farmer 1 and the minimum branches plant-1 (7.37) were recorded from the field of farmer 5. The maximum pods plant-1 (75.28) were recorded from the field of farmer 3 and the lowest pods plant -1 (30.30) were observed from the field of farmer 8. The maximum seeds plant-1 (152.37) were recorded from the field of farmer 4 and the lowest seeds plant-1 (37.97) were observed from the field of farmer 8). The maximum seed weight plant-1 (25.40 g) was observed from the field of farmer 4 and the minimum seeds weight plant-1 (6.74 g) was observed from the field of farmer 8. The maximum seed index (310.42 g) was recorded from the field of (Farmer 5) and the minimum seed index (216.03) was recorded from the field of farmer 8. The maximum seed yield (1713.7 kg ha-1) was observed from the field of farmer 1 and the minimum seed yield (309,0kg ha-1) was observed from the field of farmer 7 and the maximum biological yield (5140.9 kg ha-1) was recorded from the field of farmer 1 and the minimum biological yield (929.8 kg ha-1) was recorded from the field of farmer 7. It is therefore, suggested that subdivision (tahseel) Hyderabad rural has the great potential to cultivate Chickpea (Gram) crop to add another major Pulse crop in the cropping pattern of the area during Rabi season.
Metrics
References
Abbo, S., Redden, R. J., Yadav, S. S., Chen, W. & Sharma, B. (2007). Utilization of wild relatives. Chickpea Breeding and Management. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 3(5), 338-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932138.016
Ahmad, S., Ahmad, R., Ashraf, M. Y., Ashraf, M. & Waraich, E. A. (2009). Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) response to drought stress at germination and seedling growth stages. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41(2), 647-654.
Ali, M. A., Jabran, K., Awan, S. I., Abbas, A., Zulkiffal, M., Acet, T. & Rehman, A. (2011). Morpho-physiological diversity and its implications for improving drought tolerance in grain sorghum at different growth stages. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(3), 311-320.
Atienza, S. G. & Rubiales, D. (2017). Legumes in sustainable agriculture. Crop and Pasture Science, 68(11), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/CPv68n11_FO
Ceyhan, E., Kahraman, A., Önder, M., Ateş, M. K., Karadaş, S., Topak, R. & Avcı, M. A. (2012). Physiological and biochemical responses to drought stress of chickpea genotypes. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, 6(6), 352-357.
Chaitanya, S. K. & Chandrika, V. (2006). Performance of chickpea varieties under varied dates of sowing in Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh. Legume Research-An International Journal, 29(2), 137-139.
Challinor, A. J. & Wheeler, T. R. (2008). Crop yield reduction in the tropics under climate change: processes and uncertainties. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(3), 343-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.09.015
Chandrika, A., Faiz, S., Shah, J., Ramzan, A., Ihsan, M. & Saleem, M. (2021). Technological, processing and nutritional aspects of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Saudi Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, 6I(5), 150-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36348/sjpm.2021.v06i04.006
Choudhary, A. K., Sultana, R., Vales, M. I., Saxena, K. B., Kumar, R. R. & Ratnakumar, P. (2018). Integrated physiological and molecular approaches to improvement of abiotic stress tolerance in two pulse crops of the semi-arid tropics. The Crop Journal, 6(2), 99-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2017.11.002
Dahleen, L.S., Okubara, P.A. & Blechl, A.E. (2018). Transgenic approaches to combat Fusarium Head Blight in chickpea. Journal of Crop Science, 41(4), 628-637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.413628x
Dixit, G. P., Srivastava, A. K. & Singh, N. P. (2019). Marching towards self-sufficiency in chickpea. Current Science, 116(2), 239-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i2/239-242
FAO, F. (2019). United Nation’s Food and Agricultural Organization
FAOSTAT (2015). Food and Agriculture data FAOSTAT provides free access to Food and Agriculture data for over 245 Countries and territories and covers all FAO Regional Groupings from 1961 to the most recent year available.
Government of Pakistan [GOP] (2016). Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Govt of Pakistan. Food and Agriculture Division (Planning unit) Islamabad. Government of Pakistan.
Jameel, S., Hameed, A. & Shah, T. M. (2021). Biochemical profiling for antioxidant and therapeutic potential of Pakistani Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genetic resource. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12(3), 574-582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.663623
Kabuo, N. O., Dialoke, S. A., Omeire, G. C. & Bedi, E. N. (2015). Comparison of proximate composition of some cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivated in Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria. Food Science and Quality Management, 37(5), 103-109.
Khanna, R., Chopra, C. & Viswanathan, C. (2015). Evaluation of heat stress tolerance in irrigated environment of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and related species. Journal of Crop Science, 10(3), 169-180.
Khetrapal, S., Pal, M. A. D. A. N. & Lata, S. N. E. H. (2009). Effect of elevated temperature on growth and physiological characteristics in chickpea cultivars. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 14(4), 377-383.
Kinfe, E., Singh, P. & Fekadu, T. (2015). Physicochemical and functional characteristics of Desi and Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars grown in Bodity, Ethiopia and sensory evaluation of boiled and roasted products prepared using chickpea varieties. International Journal of Current Research Bioscience and Plant Biology, 2(3), 21-29.
Koocheki, A., Nassiri, M., Soltani, A., Sharifi, H. & Ghorbani, R. (2006). Effects of climate change on growth criteria and yield of sunflower and chickpea crops in Iran. Climate Research, 30(3), 247-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030247
Mahmood, M. T., Ahmad, M., Ali, I., Hussain, M., Latif, A. & Zubair, M. (2018). Evaluation of chickpea genotypes for genetic diversity through multivariate analysis. Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences, 15(6), 11-17.
Maqbool, M. A., Aslam, M., Ali, H. & Shah, T. M. (2016). Evaluation of advanced chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) accessions based on drought tolerance indices and SSR markers against different water treatments. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 48(4), 1421-1429.
Maqbool, M. A., Aslam, M., Ali, H., Shah, T. M., Farid, B. & Zaman, Q. U. (2015). Drought tolerance indices based evaluation of chickpea advanced lines under different water treatments. Research on Crops, 16(2), 336-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2348-7542.2015.00049.2
Misra, N., & Dwivedi, U. N. (2004). Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance of green gram cultivars. Plant Science, 166(5), 1135-1142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.11.028
O'Toole, N., Stoddard, F. L. & O'Brien, L. (2001). Screening of chickpeas for adaptation to autumn sowing. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 186(3), 193-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2001.00475.x
Oweis, T., Hachum, A. & Pala, M. (2004). Water use efficiency of winter-sown chickpea under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management, 66(2), 163-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2003.10.006
Özdemir, S. & Karadavut, U. (2004). Comparison of the performance of autumn and spring sowing of chickpeas in a temperate region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 27(6), 345-352.
Porfiri, M.J., Luth, D., Blankenship, K.M. & Anderson, A.D. (2016). Activity of a maize ubiquitin promoter in transgenic rice. Journal of Plant Biology, 23(2), 567-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00019304
Rafiq, M., Mahmood, M. T., Ahmad, M., Ali, I., Saleem, M., Rasool, I. & Ali, Z. (2020). Differential response of elite chickpea genotypes under moisture stress conditions. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture and Research, 33(6), 422-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2020/33.3.422.428
Sadras, V. O. & Monzon, J. P. (2006). Modelled wheat phenology captures rising temperature trends: Shortened time to flowering and maturity in Australia and Argentina. Field Crops Research, 99(2-3), 136-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.04.003
Sani, S. G. A. S., Chang, P. L., Zubair, A., Carrasquilla-Garcia, N., Cordeiro, M., Penmetsa, R.V. & von-Wettberg, E.J. (2018). Genetic diversity, population structure, and genetic correlation with climatic variation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces from Pakistan. The Plant Genome, 11(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2017.08.0067
Sharifi, P., Astereki, H. & Pouresmael, M. (2018). Evaluation of variations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield and yield components by multivariate technique. Annals of Agrarian Science, 16(2), 136-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2018.02.003
Talebi, R., Ensafi, M. H., Baghebani, N., Karami, E. & Mohammadi, K. (2013). Physiological response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes to drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Biology 11(3), 9-15.
Tao, F., Yokozawa, M., Xu, Y., Hayashi, Y. & Zhang, Z. (2006). Climate changes and trends in phenology and yields of field crops in China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 138(1-4), 82-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.014
Ullah, A., Shah, T. M. & Farooq, M. (2020). Pulses production in Pakistan: status, constraint and opportunities. International Journal of Plant Production, 14(4), 549-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-020-00108-2
Varshney, R. K., Thudi, M. & Muehlbauer, F. J. (2017). The chickpea genome: An introduction. In The Chickpea Genome 22(1-4), 260-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66117-9_1
Varshney, R. K., Thudi, M., Roorkiwal, M., He, W., Upadhyaya, H. D., Yang, W. & Liu, X. (2019). Resequencing of 429 chickpea accessions from 45 countries provides insights into genome diversity, domestication, and agronomic traits. Nature Genetics, 51(5), 857-864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0401-3
Wang, J., Gan, Y. T., Clarke, F. & McDonald, C. L. (2006). Response of chickpea yield to high temperature stress during reproductive development. Crop Science, 46(5), 2171-2178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.02.0092
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Abdul Hakeem Jamro, Aijaz Ahmed Soomro, Habib-Ur-Rehman Memon, Irfan Parveen Bhatti, Ata U Rehman, Shahid Riyaz Malik, Abdul Naeem Shaikh, Israr Ahmed, Hadi Bux Bozdar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 