Review Process

As an open-access journal, our review process is designed to ensure high-quality, original research is published promptly and efficiently. Here is the review process for our journal:

1. Submission: Authors submit their manuscripts to our open-access journal, following the guidelines and policies of the journal.
2. Initial check: Our editorial team performs an initial assessment to ensure that the manuscript meets the journal's standards for scope, formatting, and ethical considerations. The manuscript is sent for peer review if it passes this initial check.
3. Peer review: The manuscript is assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. They are asked to evaluate the manuscript for its scientific quality, novelty, and impact, as well as its methodology, data analysis, and interpretation. Reviewers are asked to complete their review within a specific timeframe.
4. Editorial decision: Based on the reviewers' comments, the editor decides whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the manuscript. The corresponding author is notified of the decision and any comments or recommendations from the reviewers.
5. Revisions: If revisions are requested, the corresponding author has the opportunity to make the necessary changes and resubmit the manuscript. The revised manuscript is sent back to the original reviewers for further evaluation.
6. Final decision: Once the manuscript has been revised and re-reviewed, the editor decides whether to accept the manuscript for publication. The corresponding author is notified of the final decision.

By following this review process, we aim to ensure that all manuscripts published in our open-access journal are of the highest quality and adhere to the ethical standards of academic publishing.