PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE CLONES AT PRELIMINARY YIELD TRIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34016/pjbt.2024.21.02.949Keywords:
Sugarcane, fuzz, Sri Lanka,, Barbados,, adaptability, sugar yield,, sugar recoveryAbstract
In the current study, fifteen (15) sugarcane clones developed from Sri Lanka and Barbados fuzz were evaluated for quantitative and qualitative traits in local set of climatic conditions. After testing and advancement from early stages of sugarcane cultivar development program, these clones were planted in 4th stage i.e. preliminary yield trial to evaluate the performance of clones in comparison to two local check varieties viz. CPF 253 and HSF 240. The testing sugarcane clones along with check varieties were planted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) deploying three replications during the crop season 2022-23. Biometric parameters like germination (%), plant population, plant height, 10-cane weight, cane weight and cane yield alongwith sugar recovery were studied. The biometric traits were compared using two-sided Dunnett's multiple to check the level of significance. The results showed high level of significance for all the biometric traits. The clone BDF-20-174 showed superior performance for plant population, cane yield and sugar recovery as compared to local check varieties. Similarly some other clones surpass the check varieties in some traits but their overall performance remained at par or lower than check varieties. However, further testing and experimentation will be applied to pick more adapted and suitable clones for local agro-ecological conditions
Metrics
References
Afghan, S., Z. Hussnain, K. Ali, and A. Shahzad. 2013. Performance of promising sugarcane clones developed from imported fuzz (true seed) in Pakistan. p. 24-27. ISSCT XXVIII Congress Proceedings, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ahmad, N., M.Ul-Hassan, M.A. Mudassar, M.S. Afzal, A. Khaliq, H.B. Ahmad and W. Muzaffar. (2022). A Influence of Stale Cane Seed on Productivity of Sugarcane in Semi-arid Climate. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences, 3(02), 279-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2022.3.2.34
Anonymous. (1970). Laboratory Manual for Queensland Sugar Mills. (5thEd.), Watson, Ferguson and Co., p. 94-150.
Arain, M.Y., R.N. Panhwar, N. Gujar, M. Chohan, M.A. Rajput, A.F. Soomro, and S. Junejo. 2011. Evaluation of new candidate sugarcane varieties for some qualitative and quantitative traits under Thatta agro-climatic conditions. J. Anim. Plant. Sci. 21(2): 226-230.
Chao, C.P., and J.W. Hoy. 1989. Evaluation of traits associated with resistance to sugarcane smut caused by Ustilago scitaminea. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 9: 6-18.
Crop Reporting Services. 2024. Yield Estimates, Govt of Punjab, Pakistan.
El-Geddaway, I.H., D.G. Darwesh, A.A. El-Sherbiny, E. Eldin, and A. El-Hadi. 2002. Effect of row spacing and number of buds/seed setts on growth characters of ratoon crops for some sugarcane varieties. Pakistan Sugar J. 17(3): 7-14.
Govt. of Pakistan. 2024. Pakistan Economic Survey: Agriculture. pp: 22-23.
Granger, K., and A.S. Horne. 1924. A method of inoculating the apple. Ann. Bot. 38(149): 212-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a089886
Gravois, K.A., S.B. Milligan, and F.A. Martin. 1991. Indirect selection for increased sucrose yield in early sugarcane testing stages. F. Crop. Res. 26(1): 67-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(91)90058-4
Islam, M. S., H.S. Sandhu, D. Zhao, S. Sood, A. Momotaz, O.C. Arbelo, M. Baltazar and E. Rounds. 2024. Registration of ‘CP 15‐1407’sugarcane for muck soils. Journal of Plant Registrations, 18(2), 341-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/plr2.20363
Jackson, P.A. 2005. Breeding for improved sugar content in sugarcane. F. Crop. Res. 92(2–3): 277-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.024
Jain R, S. Soloman, A.K. Shrivastava. 2006. Sugarcane germination: an overview. Indian Sugar. 55(11): 15-30.
Javed, M.A., A. Khatri, I.A. Khan, R. Ansari, M.A. Sidiqui, N.A. Bahar, M.H. Khanzada, and R. Khan. 2002. Comparative performance of elite sugarcane clones for yield and quality characteristics. Pakistan Sugar J. 17: 71-75.
Keerio, H.K., R.N. Panhwar, Y.M. Memon, M.Y. Arain, and B.R. Qazi. 2003. Qualitative and quantitative performance of some promising and commercial sugarcane varieties under agro-climatic conditions of Thatta. Pak. J. Appl. Sci. 3(10–12): 670-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2003.670.673
Khan, M.A., H.K. Keerio, S. Junejo, R.N. Panhwar, M. Aslam Rajput, Y.M. Memon, and B.R. Qazi. 2003. Evaluation of new sugarcane genotypes developed through fuzz correlation of cane yield and yield components. J. Appl. Sc. 3(4): 270-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2003.270.273
Mahmood-Ul-Hassan , H. M.W.A. Khan, M.A. Mudassir, M.S. Afzal, M. Yasin, W. Muzaffar, M.F. Ahmed, and A. Naeem. 2020. Evaluation of new sugarcane genotypes for biometric traits, resistance to red rot and borers complex under agro-climatic conditions of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 23(3): 623-629.
MacGraw-Hill, C. 2008. Statistix 8.1 (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, Florida). Maurice/ Thomas text.
Milligan, S.B., F.A. Martin, and K.A. Gravois. 1996. Inheritance of sugarcane ratooning ability and the relationship of younger crop traits to older crop traits. Crop Sci. 36(1): 45-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600010008x
Dias De Oliveira, M. E., Vaughan, B. E., & Rykiel, E. J. (2005). Ethanol as fuel: energy, carbon dioxide balances, and ecological footprint. BioScience, 55(7), 593-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0593:EAFECD]2.0.CO;2
Negi, A., & Koujalagi, D. (2018). Study of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for various yield and quality traits in sugarcane genotypes (Saccharum officinarum). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 7(4), 1464-1472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.165
Panhwar, R.N., A.F. Soomro, M. Chohan, I.B. Bhatti, A.H. Mari, S. Arain and S. Ahmad. 2022. Assessment of variation in newly developed sugarcane genotypes for morphological and quality associated parameters. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 35(3): 533-540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2022/35.3.533.540
Sharma, M.L., and T. Agarwal. 1985. Studies on the cane and sugar yield contributing characters in sugarcane cultivars. Indian Sugar. 35(2): 91-101.
Srinivasan, K. V, and N.R. Bhat. 1961. Red rot of sugarcane: Criteria for grading resistance. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 40: 566–577.
Wang, J., Roe, B., Macmil, S., Yu, Q., Murray, J. E., Tang, H., ... & Ming, R. (2010). Microcollinearity between autopolyploid sugarcane and diploid sorghum genomes. BMC genomics, 11, 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-261
Zhao, D., and Y.R. Li. 2015. Climate change and sugarcane production: Potential impact and mitigation strategies. Int. J. Agron. 2015:1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/547386
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Shahzad Afzal, Muhammad Zafar, Hafiz Bashir Ahmad, Mahmood Ul Hassan, Mubashra Yasin, Babar Hussain, Rashida Naheed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.